One era passes, another begins

And so, one era passes and another begins.

Yesterday, voters flipped control of both chambers of Congress from the Republicans to the Democrats. Votes in some races are still being counted, but NBC News projects that the Democrats will win at least 259 seats in the House of Representatives, far more than the 218 they needed to win a majority.

A Democratic victory in the House had been widely expected, but what would happen in the Senate, which had a bad map for Democrats this cycle, was unclear. There, too, voters were emphatic. Democrats flipped seven seats in the Senate: Iowa, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas.

The Senate race in Alaska hasn’t yet been called, but Democratic challenger Mary Peltola is currently slightly ahead of Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan there. Even more eye-popping, as of this writing, Democratic Senate candidate Scott Colom is ahead of the Republican incumbent in Mississippi. If he wins, he will be the first Black senator from Mississippi since Reconstruction.

In governors’ races, Democrats flipped Iowa, Georgia, Ohio, Nevada, and Texas. None of the new Democratic governors will be hamstrung by a Republican supermajority in the state legislature. Republicans in Kansas, Iowa, North Carolina, and Ohio either lost or failed to regain supermajorities that could override a governor’s veto.

The topline races don’t tell the whole story. Voters elected Democrats up and down the ballot. In Texas, the most prominent example of this phenomenon, Democratic senatorial candidate James Talarico won by about 12 points. Democratic gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa won by 7 points. Voters flipped two congressional seats in districts Trump won by at least 14 points in 2024. Voters elected a Democratic attorney general and four Democratic supreme court justices, and they flipped control of the lower chamber of the legislature.

Many of the races across the country were not close. Some races flipped by double digits from the margins of 2024. Some flips were as high as 20, 30, or even 40 percent. Observers called the results “seismic” and “jaw-dropping,” not just a blue wave but a “tsunami.”

The 2026 midterm elections marked a revolution in American politics. Election scholar Michael McDonald estimates that about 124.3 million people, or just under 50% of those eligible, turned out to vote. That rate is just under the voting rate in the 2018 midterms, which itself was the highest midterm turnout rate since 1914.

The election came off without anything more than the usual hitches, a tribute to the quiet work of dedicated lawyers and voting rights groups who have been fiercely contesting the administration’s efforts to rig the vote or to stir up opposition to accept the outcome. It was, as organizers had hoped, “too big to rig.” After months of suggesting he would contest the outcome of the election if Democrats won, Trump told New York Times reporters Erica L. Green and Tyler Pager that he would accept the results.

The historic nature of this election cannot be overstated. It is a rejection of Trump, who insisted voters should imagine he was on the ballot. But more than that, it is a rejection of the Republican ideology that has driven American politics since the 1980s: the idea that some people are better than others and have the right to rule.

That ideology took root in American politics in the late 1970s, in response to the nation’s push toward equality for racial minorities and women. The 1965 Voting Rights Act protected the right of Black and Brown Americans to vote, while the introduction of reliable birth control that same year began to permit women to enter the workforce on terms equal to men. It seemed that the equality promised in American democracy was within reach.

But to win election, Richard M. Nixon brought into the Republican Party voters who opposed the expansion of American democracy while Democrats looked to expand their tent. In 1972, even as Nixon won in a landslide, Democrats sent to Congress giants like Barbara Jordan of Texas, the first Black woman elected to Congress from the South and the first woman to deliver a keynote address at a Democratic National Convention.

In 1974, voters infuriated by Watergate flipped 49 House seats and 5 Senate seats from Republican to Democratic and elected 93 new members of Congress, 76 of whom were Democrats. In 1976 they sent Democrat Jimmy Carter to the White House, where he signed legislation that made it illegal to fire women or cut their pay because they were pregnant, expanded contracting rules to boost Black-owned businesses, worked to end racial discrimination in hiring, and created the Department of Education.

Carter’s Republican successor, Ronald Reagan, won election by attacking the modern American state and warning that people like the “Welfare Queen,” a Black woman who abused the welfare system to live large, were taking money from hardworking white people. The government should get out of people’s lives, he said, and he promised to slash taxes and regulations to permit people to accumulate wealth. In turn, he claimed, they would invest in the economy, creating jobs for everyone. Reagan and his allies tied racial and gender inequality to economic prosperity.

That combination worked—more or less—to attract voters until Trump’s second term tore it apart. Trump and appointees like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have purged the government of minorities and women and undermined the health and well-being of nonwhite Americans, immigrants, and women. But rather than benefiting regular Americans, those policies have hurt them. And administration leaders have been quite open about their intention of using the government to loot the country for themselves and their cronies.

In their determination to stop Trump and MAGA, Americans came together across the artificial lines that Republicans have exploited for more than a generation to stand against what the nation’s founders would have called tyranny. The rural areas that have made up the backbone of MAGA support joined more Democratic urban areas to elect Democrats. The racial, gender, and cultural divisions Republicans have exploited to stay in power have collapsed in the face of a rising oligarchy.

Even billionaire Elon Musk’s investment of close to half a billion dollars in Republicans in the midterms could not overcome voters’ frustration with a government that works only for the very wealthy. People across the country, organized in No Kings rallies, along overpasses, in webcasts, and in everything from political clubs to knitting communities, have come together to stand against the extraordinary corruption of the Trump regime, to oppose Trump’s rejection of constitutional limits in favor of autocratic power to declare tariffs and start wars, to demand the government address the needs of Americans, and to insist on the rule of law. Yesterday, they voted.

In Georgia, voters elected Keisha Lance Bottoms to be the first Black female governor in the nation. In New Hampshire, voters elected Chris Pappas to be the Senate’s first openly gay member. In Texas, voters elected Gina Hinojosa to be the state’s first Latina governor and the state’s first Democratic governor in more than 30 years. In New Mexico, voters elected former Interior secretary Deb Haaland to be the nation’s first female Indigenous governor. Voters in Minnesota sent Ojibwe Peggy Flanagan to the Senate. In Michigan, voters elected Abdul El-Sayed, the nation’s first Muslim senator. Voters in Ohio sent Brian Poindexter, a union ironworker, to the House of Representatives and returned Sherrod Brown, known for his defense of unions, to the Senate.

It is a historic rebuke of the Republican ideology that derailed the movement for equal rights in the 1970s in order to sway the system back toward wealthy white people.

This sea change has some immediate repercussions. By putting Congress under the control of Democrats, last night’s results will mean that it will focus on Americans’ needs and will check Trump and his administration.

Asked if the Democrats would focus on costs or corruption, Senator Rafael Warnock of Georgia told CNN that the Democrats could “walk and chew gum at the same time.” Today Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker, reelected for a third term yesterday with almost 60% of the vote, released a 75-page road map for the congressional majority, asking it to end the war in Iran, raise the minimum wage, pass comprehensive immigration reform, provide universal healthcare and childcare, put guardrails around AI, and codify abortion rights into law.

Just after 10:00 last night, Eastern time, as Democratic victories piled up, the incoming chair of the House Oversight Committee, Robert Garcia of California, had one comment for administration loyalists. On social media, he wrote: “LAWYER UP.”

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), who will retake a position as the head of the Senate Finance Committee, posted: “Subpoenas.” Among other things, Wyden has been trying to get financial information about sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein’s circle for years but has been stonewalled by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Senate Finance Committee reposted Wyden’s comment with the caption: “Let’s f*cking go.”

Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), who will likely retake the top spot at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, posted on October 28 that he is interested in hearing from Musk about his conversations with Russia’s president Vladimir Putin about satellites. “One more thing to add to the list of questions for Musk when I subpoena him,” Coons posted.

First thing this morning, Republicans set out to try to figure out a way to spin the results. President Trump posted on social media: “I wasn’t on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!” He then posted an image of a red MAGA hat with the word “VETO” on it in huge white letters, a reminder that he is still the president and a threat to veto any legislation the Democratic-dominated Congress passes.

But the election has made him the lamest of lame ducks and has already turned his attention back to his Washington, D.C., development projects. He showed up today at the White House ballroom construction site, where he described his fantasy world in which former President Joe Biden had turned Washington, D.C., into a “killing field” before he, Trump, took office the second time and fixed everything. Mostly, though, he praised his ballroom plans.

Florida governor Ron DeSantis called the election “close to an extinction-level event for Republicans in many parts of the country.” In an evident bid to set himself up to run for president in 2028, he pointed out that Florida remains controlled by Republicans while Texas underwent a Democratic sweep. This is true as far as it goes, but the surge of Angie Nixon and David Jolly in Florida, running for Senate and governor, respectively, was such a surprise that Democrats didn’t invest much in their races, which might have turned out differently if they had.

Vice President J.D. Vance doubled down on the culture wars—including backing the vile ad Republican gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy ran against Democrat Amy Acton in Ohio, weaponizing that she was raped as a child—and now is faced with the fact Acton won her election by 8 points. In a long post on social media today, Vance blamed the loss on the Iran war, a clear attempt to throw responsibility for the dramatic losses onto Trump and Hegseth.

Vance insisted that voters did not turn on the Republicans over their immigration policies, despite the poignant images of people putting their “I VOTED” stickers on shrines to Renee Good and Alex Pretti and others murdered by federal agents during immigration enforcement raids. Vance has sold himself to the white Christian nationalism at the heart of MAGA that claims immigrants are destroying “Western culture,” and it appears he will not be giving that up.

But for now, anyway, Americans have moved on.


Meanwhile, in Virginia, one blogger who is stuck in the past — stuck in the past repeated the lies of “Democrats are socialists and communists; Muslims are ‘jihadists’ who will enact ‘Sharia’ law” — said this in a loooong screed:

. . .

The Democratic Socialists of America are not simply advocating higher taxes or more generous social programs. Their national platform has entertained a fundamental restructuring of the American constitutional system, including abolishing the United States Senate, replacing the presidency and Supreme Court with leadership selected by Congress, and expanding public ownership of major corporations.

Key leaders of the DSA are connected to Hamas, Iran and socialist Cuba. The amount of anti-semitism they encourage and tolerate is reminiscent of 1930’s Europe. DSA considers Christianity a bigger threat to democracy than islam.

These are not ordinary disagreements over the size of government. They concern the very architecture of the republic and the rule of law.

. . . 

The author of that screed does not understand that he and his fellows have been shrieking the same nonsense for decades and now, like the boy who cried wolf, the rest of the world is ignoring their lies.  America will NOT return to the time of Blacks in the back of the bus, women in the kitchen, gays in the closet, and old white men in charge.

The Reflecting Pool . . .

President Donald Trump’s newly-renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was showing signs of cracking and peeling again – just hours after he declared the troubled project a success.

On Monday, Trump stood in front of the historic Washington, D.C., landmark to deliver a closing midterm election message and used the opportunity to celebrate the completion of a second round of renovations. He called the work “a complete job and we’re very proud of it.”

Shortly after his speech wrapped up, Washington Post reporters walking the perimeter of the reopened Reflecting Pool spotted several areas where the new coating appeared to be cracking or peeling.

The reporters also noted at least 20 other spots where the coating’s color was noticeably uneven, with light blue streaks appearing across the surface instead of the dark “American flag blue” Trump selected for the renovation.

Vandalism no doubt.


But wait!! There’s more.
Having just destroyed the political careers of countless Republicans, Trump today went straight back to obsessing about the only topic that seems to consistently engage his interest, which is his stupid goddam ballroom.
Trump meandered around the construction site today, then, he said to no one in particular” “Watch the beam go up,” he said as he walked away to another point inside the construction site. He then pointed at the ceiling, and said to no one in particular, “now envision chandeliers.”

Six lies you will hear on and after Election Day 2026

It isn’t hard to predict: By the time polls close Tuesday, President Donald Trump and his allies will have spread a slew of false and dangerous election conspiracy theories online.

They’ll be shrieking about late-arriving mail ballots. They’ll be falsely claiming votes from noncitizens have corrupted the midterms. They’ll be attacking election workers, as they count votes, for somehow rigging the result. And much more.

So keep in mind: Some races may take days or longer to be counted. A candidate’s lead may shrink or disappear as different batches of ballots are counted. Mail ballots cast on time may arrive after Election Day. None of those things are evidence of fraud.

But ordinary election procedures can look suspicious when stripped of context. And Trump and MAGA — with polls showing the GOP headed for a major defeat — will aim to exploit that confusion to portray routine events as evidence of a coordinated effort to rig or steal an election.

So before the first viral images or claims of a “stolen” race begin ricocheting across social media, here are some of the most predictable myths Americans are likely to hear on Election Day and in the days that follow — what those claims leave out and what’s actually happening.

One of the most predictable claims this week will be that an election is suspicious simply because the winner is not known Tuesday night.

Expect variations of the same rhetoric Tuesday night: “Why are they still counting?” “They found another batch of ballots.” “The lead changed overnight.”

Election Night results are preliminary by definition. Election officials may still be counting mail ballots, provisional ballots and votes from military and overseas voters for days afterward, depending on state law.

Some states also require additional time to verify ballots, cure defects, conduct canvasses and audit results before they become final. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission says plainly that election-night results are “unofficial and never final.”

That has not stopped the claim from spreading before voting is even finished.

On Saturday, PBS NewsHour shared a PolitiFact explainer noting that it is normal to go to bed without knowing the winner of a congressional race — and normal for a candidate who was trailing to later pull ahead as more ballots are counted.

The White House’s Rapid Response account replied: “No, it isn’t.”

The response makes clear, if it wasn’t already, how Trump intends to falsely cast doubt on results as a centerpiece of his election night message.

‘Ballots counted after Election Day are illegal votes and evidence of cheating’

A ballot counted after Election Day is not a ballot cast after Election Day.

That distinction is crucial. States set different deadlines for when mail ballots must arrive. Thirty-five states generally require mailed ballots to be received by Election Day, while 15 states and Washington, D.C., allow at least some ballots that were cast and postmarked on time to arrive afterward and still be counted.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled a major fight over those rules in June. In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the Court ruled that those states can continue accepting ballots that arrive after Election Day, after the GOP tried get the practice banned.

Those deadlines are one reason vote totals can continue changing for days. California, for example, accepts qualifying mail ballots for seven days after Election Day. Election officials also continue reviewing provisional, military and overseas ballots after polls close.

And rhetoric casting those later-counted votes as illegitimate has already started. On Monday, a prominent right-wing social media account claimed that Republican Mike Rogers could hold an early lead in Michigan’s U.S. Senate race only to see it “EVAPORATE” as later results were reported. That prompted many other accounts to reply that “late ballot” had become a “code word” for illegal voters.

But Michigan does not accept ordinary absentee ballots that simply arrive late. They generally must reach local clerks by 8 p.m. on Election Day. What can arrive late in the count are results from places such as Detroit, Ann Arbor and other large, Democratic-leaning areas, including batches of absentee ballots that take longer to process and report.

So when vote totals increase after Tuesday, you can expect claims that officials are “finding” new votes or counting ballots that should have been rejected.

They aren’t. What matters is not when a ballot appears in the unofficial tally, but whether it was cast and received according to that state’s law.

A vote counted late is not the same thing as a vote cast late.

‘Noncitizens are voting in huge numbers and deciding elections‘

Noncitizens are barred from voting in federal elections, and people who knowingly do so can face criminal charges. The Trump administration has made such cases a major focus of his agenda, announcing prosecutions across multiple states and saying its nationwide investigations have led to about 160 arrests since January 2025.

But despite its aggressive efforts, The cases identified so far represent a tiny fraction of the more than 200 million active registered voters nationwide. And repeated investigations continue to find that noncitizen voting is exceptionally rare and has never changed an election outcome.

The distinction has become especially important this fall because federal agencies are using immigration and voter-registration databases to identify people they say may be noncitizens.

In California, for example, the Department of Justice sent the state a list of more than 20,000 registered voters it said were likely noncitizens and asked officials to set aside their ballots. But an analysis filed in court by the UCLA Voting Rights Project found that 42% of the names did not match anyone on California’s current voter file. It also identified U.S. citizens on the list, and concluded that thousands of naturalized citizens were likely wrongly flagged. DOJ disputes that analysis. Courts have so far rejected federal demands to segregate the ballots.

Trump has already used that disputed list to suggest the problem is vastly larger. Asked about the 20,000 names on Oct. 23, he said he was “not surprised” and claimed the true number “could be hundreds of thousands,” calling the 20,000 “just a batch.” He offered no evidence for that extrapolation and went on to call voting in California and Minnesota corrupt.

The episode illustrates how quickly a list of people merely suspected of being noncitizens can be transformed into a claim that hundreds of thousands of illegal voters exist. The government’s list itself has now been shown to contain apparent citizens, naturalized citizens and names that could not even be matched to California’s current voter file.

So expect to hear large numbers attached to phrases like “suspected noncitizens” or “potentially ineligible voters.”

Those phrases are not interchangeable with cases of confirmed noncitizens who actually cast ballots.

Being flagged by a database is not proof someone is ineligible. Being improperly registered does not prove that person voted. And isolated cases of unlawful voting are not evidence of a coordinated scheme capable of determining an election.

‘Mail voting makes it easy to manufacture, duplicate or steal ballots’

Claims that mail voting allows people to easily create fake ballots, vote twice or steal someone else’s ballot ignore the essential safeguards used before a returned ballot is counted. You might see viral photos or videos of ballots found in apartment buildings, mailrooms or other locations, with the claim that it must be evidence of illegal voting.

Leading Republicans are also already portraying the ordinary pattern of later-counted mail ballots as something more sinister. In an interview with right-wing host Benny Johnson circulating Sunday, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) recalled Republican candidates leading around midnight in a previous election before additional votes were reported and alleged that an “insidious dark force” on the left wanted to “steal elections.”

But a candidate losing an early lead as mail ballots are added does not show that ballots were manufactured or stolen. Different types of ballots are processed and reported at different times, and mail voters can have different partisan preferences than people who vote in person. The changing total reflects which lawful votes have been counted so far, not where the ballots supposedly came from.

It isn’t. Election officials track whether a voter has already returned a ballot, and states use measures such as unique ballot identifiers, voter records, signature verification and chain-of-custody procedures to detect duplicate or suspicious submissions. If a voter returns a mail ballot and later tries to vote again, election systems are designed to prevent two ballots from being counted.

Mistakes, theft and isolated fraud can happen, and election officials investigate those cases when they do. But the existence of unused or misdelivered ballots is not evidence that fraudulent votes entered the count. Just as noncitizen voting is extremely rare, so are other forms of illegitimate voting, including those done by manipulating mail ballots.

The important question is whether a ballot was actually returned, verified and accepted — not simply whether election mail existed somewhere it should not have.

‘Election workers are secretly altering, destroying or manufacturing ballots’

Election workers routinely handle, inspect, duplicate, sort and transport ballots as part of counting them. Those procedures can look suspicious in a short video or photo when the surrounding process is missing.

A damaged ballot, for example, may need to be duplicated onto a clean ballot so a scanner can read it. Workers may also open mail-ballot envelopes, separate ballots from identifying information, reconcile batches and transport sealed containers between secure locations. Those steps are governed by state procedures and are typically conducted under observation or bipartisan controls.

But routine election work has repeatedly been portrayed as evidence that officials are secretly creating or destroying votes.

After the 2020 election, Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss became the targets of false fraud allegations after surveillance footage of normal ballot counting was circulated out of context. The claims led to years of threats and harassment, and the two later won a defamation judgment over the accusations.

And mundane election disruptions are already generating similar suspicions this year. On Monday morning, two of Maricopa County’s roughly 150 vote centers temporarily closed because of power problems. Both reopened that morning, and voters could use any other county vote center in the meantime. Yet the outages quickly fed online speculation about election interference and renewed calls for federal authorities to scrutinize the county.

A power outage, scanner problem or temporary polling-place closure can be a genuine problem that election officials have to fix. But the existence of a problem is not evidence that workers deliberately created it to suppress or alter votes.

Similar claims are expected again this year, including allegations that workers are stuffing ballot boxes, destroying valid ballots or manufacturing mail votes.

A video showing an election worker touching or reproducing a ballot is not proof of fraud. The questions are what procedure is being performed, whether state law allows it and whether required chain-of-custody and observation rules were followed.

‘Officials can refuse to certify the results if they suspect fraud’

Local election officials do not get to overturn or veto results because they distrust them.

Certification is typically a mandatory, ministerial duty: Officials review the completed canvass and formally sign off on the results by deadlines set in state law. Claims of fraud, misconduct or ineligible ballots are handled through separate legal processes, such as recounts, election contests and court challenges. Certification is not supposed to become an investigation of every allegation circulating online.

That has not stopped officials from trying.

And in Alaska, that possibility is already being discussed before Election Day. Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R) declined last week to commit to signing off on the U.S. Senate result if Democrat Mary Peltola defeats Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) while a state investigation into allegations of “ballot stacking” remains open. Dunleavy claimed that if investigators find wrongdoing and “that means that the certification then is stopped or changed, then that’s what happens.”

But Alaska law does not give the governor discretion to decide who won the election. The state elections director is required to certify the candidate with the most votes after the official review. The governor has a separate federal duty to transmit the Senate winner’s credentials, and even withholding those credentials would not give him the final word: under the Constitution, the U.S. Senate judges the elections and qualifications of its own members.

Since 2020, local officials in states including Arizona, Michigan, New Mexico and Nevada have refused or threatened to certify results, often citing fraud claims or distrust of voting systems. And there were at least 17 attempts to interfere with certification during the 2024 election cycle alone. None succeeded in preventing the results from ultimately being certified. Courts and state officials intervened when necessary.

Courts can order reluctant officials to perform their legal duties, and some states allow officials to step in directly. Officials who refuse can also face removal or, depending on state law and the circumstances, civil or criminal consequences.

So expect to hear that a county’s refusal to certify proves something must be wrong with its election.

It doesn’t.

A certification standoff can delay results, trigger emergency litigation and fuel conspiracy theories. But an official’s personal suspicion is not evidence of fraud — and in most states, it is not legal authority to withhold certification.

The Trump Administration is Nothing but a Mob Family

A very abbreviated list of a few corruption scandals from the first half of Trump’s second term

The following is merely a list of a few highlights, and omits many items:

*Trump founded a cryptocurrency firm at the same moment he was deregulating the entire crypto industry.  He then bought a separate firm that he used to buy his own cryptocurrency, while at the same time raising nearly one billion dollars from investors to buy that very same cryptocurrency.

*He launched a meme coin, aka, a lightly tarted up Ponzi scheme, that netted him hundreds of millions of dollars, even as the coin lost 97% of its value.   Mandatory financial disclosures revealed eventually that investors had collectively lost $3.8 billion on this scheme, while Trump himself had netted $636 million, since he made money on every transaction, whether the value of the coin went up or down.

*Relatedly, he received the benefit of enormous crypto “investments” from foreign nationals, that were often barely disguised bribes.  He pardoned one of these investors, Changpeng Zhao, the founder of Binance, wiping out a serious criminal conviction.  Prior to Trump issuing this pardon, Binance had provided critical software and infrastructure to World Liberty Financial, the cryptocurrency start-up co-founded by Trump and his sons.

*His son-in-law Jared Kushner, a man with no experience in either high finance investment or international diplomacy, was given two billion dollars to manage by Saudi Arabia – this generated a $40 million investment fee per year for Kushner – and then was appointed by Trump to handle wartime negotiations with Iran, Saudi Arabia’s bitterest regional rival.  In the midst of the negotiation, Kushner solicited five billion more dollars for his fund from the Saudis and other Middle Eastern governments.

*In the summer of 2025, the nation of Qatar gave Trump a $400 million luxury jumbo jet as a gift.  This was a completely unambiguous violation of the Constitution’s emoluments clause.

FOR THE REST OF THE STORY, GO TO THIS PAGE.

“. . . just enough to wet my beak.”

Who says Trump doesn’t think there should be consequences for misconduct he is personally involved with?

President Trump erupted last week after he learned that one of his former lawyers, Alina Habba Mildon, secured a contract worth more than $50 million to work for a billionaire Venezuelan family.

Angered at the size of Mrs. Mildon’s deal, Mr. Trump has told aides and allies that she should donate a portion of that money to his future presidential library or another Trump-related entity, according to multiple people briefed on the conversations.

His fury came in response to reporting by The New York Times that Mrs. Mildon, while working as an adviser at the Justice Department, had signed on last year to serve as an extraordinarily well compensated general counsel for a company started by the daughter of Julio Herrera Velutini, who at the time was seeking a pardon from Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump told at least one ally that the Herrera family should not pay out the rest of the contract, a message that got back to them, the people said.