No details on the message content, though that information may leak later.
You can bet the message is this:
- The message is likely the intercept of a foreign person involved in the current negotiations involving Kushner and Israel reps who is reporting to his higher-ups about details of talks with Israel about Iran and other Middle East issues.
- The individual who is the sender of the message probably is reporting that Kushner is pushing for approval for Trump to purchase or to be granted oceanfront property in Gaza for the construction of Trump resorts.
- Tulsi Gabbard, the totally unqualified Director of National Intelligence, likely is trying to hide this message to protect Kushner and Trump. (Gabbard is on the right of the photo below.)
My suspicion is that the conversation about Kushner was one of two things. (1) How much money do we have to give him to get Donald Trump to do what we want, or (2) This Kushner is an imbecile and we can manipulate him at will to do anything we want just by making him feel smart. Or both.

Whenever someone like Tulsi is selling the national interest down the river, you know who’s likely to be clearing a profit on the deal:
The highly classified whistleblower complaint against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is related to a conversation intercepted last spring in which two foreign nationals discussed Jared Kushner, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
It couldn’t be determined which country the foreign nationals are from or what they discussed about Kushner. But the connection to Kushner sheds further light on the top-secret whistleblower complaint that bureaucratically stalled within Gabbard’s agency for eight months and was kept locked in a safe until it reached Congress in heavily redacted form last week.
Senior Trump administration officials said the claims about Kushner were demonstrably false, but declined to offer more specifics about the conversation on grounds that doing so could expose a highly sensitive surveillance method.
The allegations in the conversation about Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, would be significant if verified, according to other U.S. officials familiar with its contents. While those officials agreed there was no corroborating evidence to support the allegations, they said that didn’t prove they lacked any merit.
The Wall Street Journal and others reported last week that the complaint was based on a foreign-intelligence conversation collected by the National Security Agency. The conversation included a discussion about a person close to Trump and at least in part concerned issues related to Iran, the Journal reported.
Kushner is at the center of some of the administration’s toughest national security initiatives. He devised the plan to rebuild Gaza and has joined Trump envoy Steve Witkoff in negotiations to end the war in Ukraine and dismantle Iran’s nuclear work, including a meeting with Iranian officials last week in Oman.
Like in Trump’s first term, when he orchestrated peace talks between Israel and Arab nations, Kushner touts his business background as an asset in diplomacy, often deriding career government officials as too bureaucratic and slow. He is now running an investment fund, Affinity Partners, which has drawn billion-dollar investments from the Arab monarchies, and has pursued potential projects around the world.
[…]
A heavily redacted version of the complaint was seen by select lawmakers in Congress last week after The Journal first reported on its existence and that it had stalled within Gabbard’s office. Democrats have questioned why the complaint was held up for eight months and indicated it raises national-security concerns that deserve more investigation. Republicans have defended Gabbard and said the attention on the complaint has been orchestrated to undermine the Trump administration.
I like how the Republican “defense” is essentially “of course Tulsi had to cover this up, it will make us look bad.”
