The United States is now facing the greatest threat to our free way of life in our history. Even the US Civil War was not the danger that is Donald Trump. In the Civil War, the South wanted to separate from the rest of the Union. Today, Trump does not want to separate from the US, he seeks to destroy the fundamental functions and purpose of the US. He seeks to destroy the Constitution, replacing the Judiciary and Legislative Branches with puppets of the Executive. Plainly stated, Trump seeks to establish himself as a dictator . . . and as of May 2025, he may succeed.
Just remember who you are and say it loudly and proudly.
The threat to our constitutional rights is real and growing.
On Race:
If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024
If you’re a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022
Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023
If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024
If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023
On Debate
We record all of it so that we put [it] on the internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence. That’s when civil war happens, because you start to think the other side is so evil, and they lose their humanity.
– Kirk discussing his work in an undated clip that circulated on X after his killing.
Prove me wrong.
– Kirk’s challenge to students to publicly debate him during the tour of colleges he was on when he was assassinated.
On Gender, Feminism & Reproductive Rights
Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.
– Discussing news of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s engagement on The Charlie Kirk Show, 26 August 2025
The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered.
– Responding to a question about whether he would support his 10-year-old daughter aborting a pregnancy conceived because of rape on the debate show Surrounded, published on 8 September 2024
We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 April 2024
On Guns
I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023
On Immigration
America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025
The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024
The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 March 2024
On Islam & Religion
America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 30 April 2025
We’ve been warning about the rise of Islam on the show, to great amount of backlash. We don’t care, that’s what we do here. And we said that Islam is not compatible with western civilization.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 24 June 2025
Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.
– Charlie Kirk social media post, 8 September 2025
There is no separation of church and state. It’s a fabrication, it’s a fiction, it’s not in the constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 6 July 2022
A weird thing happened yesterday afternoon while I was listening to MSNBC’s coverage of the shooting of Charlie Kirk, which morphed into its coverage of the murder of Charlie Kirk. I hadn’t been paying close attention to the discussion, but at one point after it was confirmed that Kirk had died, host Ari Melber closed a panel discussion before a commercial break by saying that Kirk’s career involved “goin’ around to talk to young people about ideas and society. […] He was peacefully engaging people in discourse, and he was shot down and murdered today.”
This is an accurate quote, because it was such a weird way to describe the late professional bullshit artist that I paused the DVR to make sure I got it right. To hear Melber describe him, Kirk was some kind of itinerant Buddhist monk traveling from campus to campus, challenging young people to examine their cherished beliefs and assumptions, or perhaps engaging them in Platonic dialogue to probe difficult concepts and come to an understanding. But then he was cut down as he tried valiantly to bring enlightenment.
WTF??? It was embarrassing. Charlie Kirk “debated” like people on Twitter do: to score cheap points and to DESTROY your opponent by trying to make them look foolish, logic and evidence be damned. His tour slogan, emblazoned on the awning above where he was shot, was “PROVE ME WRONG,” not “Come, let us reason together.”
But it turns out that a lot of people who should know better are talking about Kirk as if he were some kind of serious thinker, not as the low-rent troll he actually was. It’s really weird how rapidly the narrative switched from “Political violence is unacceptable” or even “Like any of us, he had the right to speak without being murdered” to “This victim of (apparently) political violence was a good man cut down in the prime of life, and we should all be more like him.”
Let’s be clear here: Charlie Kirk’s murder was a tragedy for America because it’s likely to lead to more political violence, and because we should be able to resolve political disputes through politics, not killing. But being the victim of a senseless assassination doesn’t ennoble anything the man did in his career of trolling, lying, and pushing hate.
ON Sep 11, 2025, Trump was at the 9/11 memorial service at the Pentagon. He clearly suffered a stroke — he sat down and later slumped to the side. The give-away is the facial drop that is obvious on the right side of his face — corner of mouth drooping, right eye drooping, leaning to that side.
Charles James Kirk was a man of words. Let us remember some of them.
On the attempted assassination of Rep. Pelosi and vicious attack on her husband.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/charlie-kirk-bail-out-alleged-paul-pelosi-attacker-1234621493/
“Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk said Monday on his podcast of the man who allegedly beat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi‘s husband Paul with a hammer last Friday. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out, I bet his bail’s like thirty or forty thousand bucks.” With a smirk, he added: “Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.”
On Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Act of 1960.
https://www.wired.com/story/charlie-kirk-tpusa-mlk-civil-rights-act/
“MLK was awful,” Kirk said. “He’s not a good person. He said one good thing he actually didn’t believe.”
“I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I’ve thought about it,” Kirk said at America Fest. “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”“We’re gonna be hitting him next week,” Kirk said on his podcast this week. “Yeah, on the day of the Iowa caucus, it’s MLK Day. We’re gonna do the thing you’re not supposed to do. We’re gonna tell the truth about MLK Jr. You better tune in next week. Blake has already been preparing. It’s gonna be great.”
NOTE: “Blake” is an apparent reference to Blake Neff, a producer of The Charlie Kirk Show. In 2020, Neff resigned from his job at Fox News as Tucker Carlson’s top writer after CNN revealed he had been making racist posts under a pseudonym. Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott called Neff’s posts “abhorrent.”
On the necessity of gun violence to maintain 2nd Amendment. Seriously. That’s what he said.
https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-its-worth-have-cost-unfortunately-some-gun-deaths-every-single-year-so-we
You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It’s drivel. But I am — I think it’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.
He also lashed out at the gay community, saying that the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which calls for the execution of homosexuals, serves as “God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”
Leviticus 20:13; King James Version
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
The National Guard, in measuring public sentiment about President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of Washington, D.C., has assessed that its mission is perceived as “leveraging fear,” driving a “wedge between citizens and the military,” and promoting a sense of “shame” among some troops and veterans, according to internal documents reviewed by The Washington Post.
The assessments, which have not been previously reported, underscore how domestic mobilizations that are rooted in politics risk damaging Americans’ confidence in the men and women who serve their communities in times of crisis. The documents reveal, too, with a rare candor in some cases, that military officials have been kept apprised that their mission is viewed by a segment of society as wasteful, counterproductive and a threat to long-standing precedent stipulating that U.S. soldiers — with rare exception — are to be kept out of domestic law enforcement matters.
Trump has said the activation of more than 2,300 National Guard troops was necessary to reduce crime in the nation’s capital, though data maintained by the D.C. police indicates an appreciable decline was underway long before his August declaration of an “emergency.” In the weeks since, the Guard has spotlighted troops’ work assisting the police and “beautifying” the city by laying mulch and picking up trash, part of a daily disclosure to the news media generated by Joint Task Force D.C., the military command overseeing the deployment.
Not for public consumption, however, is an internal “media roll up” that analyzes the tone of news stories and social media posts about the National Guard’s presence and activities in Washington. Government media relations personnel routinely produce such assessments and provide summaries to senior leaders for their awareness. They stop short of drawing conclusions about the sentiments being raised.
House Democrats on Monday released a screenshot of a letter signed by President Donald Trump, which was included in a collection of notes sent to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003.
The letter features a conversation between Trump and Epstein inside an apparently hand-drawn outline of a woman’s torso. Trump’s signature is located just below the hips of the drawing.
“HERE IT IS: We got Trump’s birthday note to Jeffrey Epstein that the President said doesn’t exist,” the X account for the House Oversight Committee’s Democratic minority wrote in a post revealing the letter. CNBC has requested comment from a spokesman for Trump’s legal team. The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.
The screenshot released Monday afternoon reveals the letter exactly as it was described in a mid-July report from The Wall Street Journal, which first uncovered the existence of the “bawdy” message.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/08/trump-epstein-birthday-book-oversight.html
What is an American?” This was the question Senator Eric Schmitt (R, MO) posed at the fifth annual National Conservatism Conference in Washington. His answer is that the nation is fundamentally not based on the idea of equality or freedom or any other ideal. Nor is it accessible to people of all races and religions. It is fundamentally, he told an assembled crowd, a white homeland.
The white Europeans who settled America and conquered the West “believed they were forging a nation—a homeland for themselves and their descendants,” he said. “They fought, they bled, they struggled, they died for us. They built this country for us. America, in all its glory, is their gift to us, handed down across the generations. It belongs to us. It’s our birthright, our heritage, our destiny. If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all. But we know that’s not true. America is not a ‘universal nation.’ ”
The implications of this vision are serious. This is a repudiation of our Constitution and the core of a national identity that includes all its citizens. It means that to be American is not about citizenship at all. “What is an American?” Schmitt asked. It is a white person. America is a white homeland that organically binds together white people of the past, present and future. And its policies must be guided for their benefit if they are to succeed.
“A strong, sovereign nation—not just an idea but a home, belonging to a people bound together by a common past and a shared destiny.”
And there you have it, folks — America is NOT a land where “all men are created equal” — we are a “white homeland” and we should act like it.
According to MAGA, students saddled with overwhelming debt didn’t deserve student loan forgiveness. People suffering from food insecurity didn’t deserve government assistance. All of those fancy know-it-all researchers curing cancer didn’t need government funding. But when they’re the ones hurting? Suddenly it’s time for Uncle Sam to bail them out.
Back in March, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social: “To the Great Farmers of the United States: Get ready to start making a lot of agricultural product to be sold INSIDE of the United States. Tariffs will go on external product on April 2nd. Have fun!”
But now, according to Arkansas station KAIT, hundreds of farmers gathered in Brookland to beg state leaders for help.
Chris King, a Woodruff County farmer, reminded the crowd that Trump had once told him, “I love you,” and now he wanted to see “the fruit of that love.”
King explained that this was his 39th harvest, and he had never seen conditions so dire.
“I have never been as worried as I am now about whether or not my kids and grandkids will be able to carry on,” he admitted.
The problem, he said, is simple: They can’t sell for profit.
“I just would like to see somebody help us get our markets back. We need our exports, and we just need to be paid for what we do, and that’s not happening, and we’re in real trouble,” King said.
But who cost King and his buddies those exports in the first place? Trump, the man they happily elected. Why should anyone feel sorry for them, funneling more blue-state resources to people who insist on punching themselves in the face?
Scott Brown, a farmer from Biggers, was just as gloomy. He warned that “you are going to lose 25-30% of the farmers in this country if they don’t do something.”
And he said that Trump’s tariffs are the final straw.
“I think the tariffs are the ice cream on the cake of a perfect storm. When you try and sell a product, okay, U.S. soybeans leaving New Orleans without the tariff to China are cheaper than Brazilian soybeans, at the current market. But when you put the tariff on top of them, Brazilian beans are cheaper.”
Because for these farmers, Trump’s “fun” has meant lost markets, collapsing prices, and neighbors talking about going under.
And there’s the crux: U.S. consumers don’t need these farmers for cheaper groceries—we can get them from overseas. Trump can’t raise tariffs on imports much higher without driving up grocery prices even further, which would crush Republicans at the ballot box.
Meanwhile, farmers are being slammed with Trump-induced inflation, Trump-induced labor shortages as immigrant workers are deported or driven away, and Trump-induced cuts to the very programs that once gave them a cushion. Their hospitals and clinics haven’t closed yet—but give it time, that’s coming, too. So much fun, they’ll be tired of all the fun.
Brown conceded that, in the short term, “they have no choice but to mail us a check.”
He also insisted that no farmer likes taking taxpayer dollars, but “nobody wants to go broke, nobody wants to lose everything. Long term, we have to have options, markets, and places to sell our product.”
How about no? Students didn’t get debt relief, even though millions were promised a fresh start from crushing loans. Hungry families are watching food pantries close as pandemic-era assistance dries up. Cancer researchers see their funding slashed, teachers are told to buy their own supplies, and veterans fight tooth and nail for basic benefits. But these Trump-voting farmers think they’re owed a taxpayer bailout?
.
