Charlie Kirk Memorial Rally — old-fashioned KKK rally — 1930’s Germany Nazi rally — can’t tell the difference.

President Donald Trump used his speech at the memorial service for conservative activist Charlie Kirk on Sunday at 63,400-seat State Farm Stadium in Arizona, to continue obscuring Kirk’s long record of hateful and bigoted comments and views. Other speakers were also a part of the process of using what was billed as a memorial service instead as a political rally for the right.

“He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose. He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said. “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie, I hate my opponent.”

In fact, hate was central to Kirk’s career as a political organizer for the right and as a political pundit. From his platform, Kirk preached bigotry against multiple groups of Americans. He struck out against transgender people, in January referring to the “trans mafia” and the “purple haired jihadis” who he praised as “being run out in decent society.” Years before that he said a trans student in Wyoming should be bullied and imprisoned.

Kirk also called for former President Joe Biden to be executed and argued that Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is Black, did not “have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously” and “had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, also brushed past her husband’s incendiary rhetoric in her speech, instead alleging that “the greatest cause in Charlie’s life was trying to revive the American family.”

By contrast, figures like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have condemned Kirk’s killing while also speaking out against efforts to whitewash who he was.

On Friday, while speaking in opposition to a congressional resolution honoring Kirk, Ocasio-Cortez noted, “We can deeply disagree and come together as a country to denounce the horror of this killing, and it is not a license for the abuse of power and whitewashing of American history.”

The measure passed the House with the support of 95 Democrats, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

The right and the Republican Party have chosen to weaponize Kirk’s death and to use it as an excuse to go after the left in America. The killing is being used as a flimsy cover for attacks on free speech and the First Amendment, most notably the decision to use the FCC to pressure Disney/ABC to sideline host Jimmy Kimmel.

At the memorial, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who has a history of supporting white supremacy, continued the crusade.

Miller falsely claimed that the political left supported Kirk’s killing, adding, “You have nothing. You are nothing. You are wickedness, you are jealousy, you are envy, you are hatred, you are nothing.”

The rally was billed as a memorial to a slain political figure, but ultimately it was a full-blown Nazi/KKK rally, another moment in which the right decided to lie about who Kirk was while using the moment to push their hate-filled political agenda.

Once again Trump reveals his true self, and, once again, it is evil, vile, ugly, and stupid — which tells us a lot about his followers

The major news on Sunday was the memorial service for Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk’s widow forgave her husband’s killer. In contrast, Trump said,

[Charlie] did not hate his opponents; he wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them.

Trump violated the cardinal rule when you are asked to speak at the memorial service for someone who has passed away: It’s not about you.

But with Trump, everything is about him–which explains nearly all of America’s present political dysfunction.

Not a single member of the president’s party condemned his vile remarks. So, I won’t say it. The cowardice and double standard of the Republican Party are in every story about Trump’s vulgar, hateful, corrupt actions.


The GOP’s failure to pass funding bills for the new fiscal year.

The GOP must pass 12 funding bills or a “continuing resolution” to keep the entire government funded after September 30, 2025. Neither appears likely to happen, so we should prepare to join the messaging battle over the government shutdown, if it occurs.

Democrats have said that they are willing to support a continuing resolution on two conditions. First, Republicans must agree to protect the Affordable Care Act and other healthcare programs. Second, Trump must agree to abide by the spending mandates included in the 12 funding bills that Congress will pass.

Senator Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries sent a letter to Trump that described the first condition as follows:

We will not support a dirty spending bill that continues the Republican assault on healthcare, which includes devastating Medicaid and Medicare cuts; skyrocketing premiums, co-pays, and deductibles; the refusal to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits; unprecedented attacks on medical research and the public health system; the suppression of vaccine availability; and the forced closure of hospitals, nursing homes and community-based health clinics nationwide.

I have frequently been wrong (and surprised) by last-minute agreements that have avoided predicted shutdowns in the past that seemed certain to occur. Stay tuned.


Trump says he will nominate one of his personal lawyers to replace acting US Attorney for Eastern District of Virginia

Given its proximity to Washington, D.C., the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is one of the most important federal district courts in the nation. It handles most of the sensitive national security suits filed by the United States government.

Last Friday, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District, Erik Siebert, resigned after he refused to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James over nonexistent mortgage fraud allegations.

On Sunday, Trump indicated that he would nominate yet another of his personal attorneys to serve as the head of a federal district. Trump indicated that he would nominate Lindsay Halligan, who worked as part of the legal team defending him against the indictment for refusing to return national security documents. Prior to that assignment, Halligan worked as an insurance attorney in Florida for approximately eight years. She has no experience as a prosecutor or public defender in federal or state court.

In other words, Halligan is absolutely unqualified to serve as US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. See Times of India, Lindsey Halligan’s education and career: How a Florida insurance lawyer from Regis University became Trump’s US attorney nominee

But Halligan has one important qualification (in Trump’s view): She is apparently willing to indict Letitia James in the absence of any evidence.

Trump’s “reply to all” Truth Social post revealed his political animus in pursuing Letitia James and Adam Schiff for mortgage fraud. Proving selective prosecution as a defense is nearly impossible under normal circumstances. The defendant must prove that the prosecution acted with an improper motive, which includes retaliating against the defendant for engaging in protected First Amendment activities. See United States v. Armstrong | 517 U.S. 456 (1996).

Here, Trump has handed the defense lawyers irrefutable evidence of his improper motive in pursuing mortgage fraud charges against Letitia James and Adam Schiff. He seeks to punish them because “I was indicted 5 times and impeached TWICE.” Lawyers for both James and Schiff should already be working on motions to dismiss their upcoming indictments.

It is difficult to describe the depravity of Trump’s moves to replace the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia in order to ensure the unlawful prosecution of Letitia James and Adam Schiff. When former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch met for about 20 minutes in 2016, Republicans—including Trump—squealed like stuck pigs.

In contrast, the sitting president is directing the Attorney General to replace an acting US Attorney (appointed by Trump) in order to ensure the indictment of Letitia James and Adam Schiff. Trump has already publicly declared that James and Schiff are “guilty,” something no other president has ever done before the trial and conviction of a defendant.

Every Republican should be outraged about Trump’s political weaponization of the DOJ in a way that only a dictator would attempt. For that matter, Democrats should be making a lot more noise about this unprecedented corruption of the presidency and the DOJ. And those seeking to defend democracy must include Trump’s dismantling of the DOJ as part of our protests.

It’s a lot, I know. But we don’t get to pick and choose the crises that we face.


Trump acts as “dealmaker” for sale of TikTok to Trump oligarch allies in US

In 2024, Congress passed a statute that required the owners of TikTok to divest ownership of the social media platform from its Chinese parent corporation, ByteDance. That divestiture was required to occur before January 19, 2025. If the divestiture did not occur by January 19, then American social media and technology companies were prohibited from carrying TikTok on their platforms.

Trump ignored the divestiture deadline. Instead, he began to assume the role as “lead negotiator” in the divestiture transaction. Last week, reports emerged that Trump had arranged the sale of TikTok to conservative tech oligarchs. Trump allies Larry Ellison and Marc Andreessen will assume majority control under a proposed divestiture. See Forbes, Larry Ellison’s Oracle Among Controlling Investors In TikTok Deal, Report Says.

Having Ellison and Andreesen as TikTok’s controlling shareholders is bad enough, but Trump is now working to include the Murdoch family (owner of Fox News) in the acquisition group. See The HillTrump says Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch are likely part of TikTok buyer group.

In short, TikTok will likely become the video analog of Twitter’s conservative hellscape. And we got here because Trump refused to enforce a congressional statute requiring the deplatforming of TikTok in January 2025.

Instead, he unlawfully claimed for himself the power to act as a dealmaker to ensure that the world’s largest social media platform would be placed in the hands of MAGA-friendly capitalists.

This is yet another example of “giving Trump a pass” when he acts in violation of statute and the Constitution.

He ignores the law to benefit himself. Every single violation must be criticized and condemned.

As it is, the financial and political press are reporting only on the details of the TikTok divestiture, rather than its unlawful nature!

HItler 1933 vs. Trump 2025: Trump is winning


Introduction: Fragile Democracies and Rapid Change

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does have a nasty habit of rhyming. When Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in January 1933, few expected that within eighteen months the Weimar Republic would be dead and a total dictatorship firmly in place. Hitler didn’t seize power in a single coup; he exploited legal mechanisms, manufactured crises, and pushed every emergency to the extreme until there were no checks left on his authority.

Fast forward almost a century. In January 2025, Donald Trump returned to the presidency of the United States, promising “retribution” against enemies, radical reversals of his predecessor’s policies, and a sweeping agenda of national “restoration.” Nine months into that second term, his pace has been astonishing. He has invoked emergencies, reshaped federal agencies, issued sweeping executive orders, and demanded loyalty from institutions that are supposed to serve the Constitution, not the president personally.

The contexts are very different: the United States has stronger courts, federalism, civil society, and constitutional traditions than Germany in 1933. Yet there are enough parallels in the methods and speed of change to warrant careful attention. The comparison below doesn’t claim America in 2025 is Germany in 1933. But it does suggest that if we fail to see the signs of erosion, we risk learning the same lesson Germany did: democracies can collapse quickly, almost imperceptibly, until one day they are gone.


Hitler’s Path to Dictatorship, 1933–34

Hitler’s rise to absolute power is often remembered as inevitable, but it was anything but. When President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him Chancellor on January 30, 1933, the Nazi Party lacked a majority in the Reichstag. Hitler was just another coalition politician, albeit one with a growing movement behind him. Yet within weeks, he had maneuvered into a position that allowed him to dismantle Germany’s democratic institutions.

From there, the dismantling accelerated. Trade unions were dissolved, political parties outlawed, and state governments brought under Nazi control in a process known as Gleichschaltung (“coordination”). By mid-1933, the Nazi Party was the only legal political party in Germany. In June 1934, Hitler consolidated his control over the military and conservative elites through the violent purge of the “Night of the Long Knives.” And when Hindenburg died in August 1934, Hitler merged the offices of Chancellor and President, demanding an oath of personal loyalty from the army. The dictatorship was complete.

All of this happened in a year and a half.


Trump’s Second Term, 2025

Trump’s return to power in January 2025 was not greeted with the same disbelief that accompanied Hitler’s appointment in 1933, but it has nonetheless unleashed a torrent of rapid change. On his first day in office, Trump rescinded nearly all of Biden’s executive orders. He quickly signed Executive Order 14149, billed as a “free speech” measure, aimed at curbing federal agencies’ ability to regulate, fact-check, or moderate speech.

In February, he issued an executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens — immediately blocked in court, but a bold assertion of executive power against constitutional precedent. Around the same time, he signed another order titled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” invoking the language of existential crisis to frame immigration as a national emergency.

By March, Trump directed the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security to investigate supposed “election fraud networks,” reprising themes from his “Stop the Steal” campaign. At the end of that month, he signed EO 14253, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” ordering federal museums, agencies, and the Smithsonian to remove what his administration calls “ideological distortions” and reinstate statues or exhibits reflecting a more “patriotic” narrative.

In the spring, Trump openly called for boycotts of “woke companies” and threatened to strip federal contracts from firms with “anti-American” policies. By summer, he declared a Crime Emergency in Washington D.C., seizing control of the city’s police force and deploying National Guard units — a move many legal experts considered a dangerous precedent for federal overreach.

By mid-year, loyalists had been installed across agencies from the DOJ to the FCC, the NEA, and the Smithsonian. By late 2025, Trump’s DOJ was prosecuting political opponents, sparking accusations that the justice system was being used as a weapon. Even more ominously, reports surfaced that Trump was pressing for loyalty oaths from federal employees and exploring ways to restructure the National Guard and DHS to answer directly to him. At the same time, two prominent late-night hosts, Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, were forced off the air under heavy political pressure from Trump allies — a striking echo of authoritarian efforts to silence dissenting voices in culture and media.

All of this has happened in less than a year.


Accelerated Timeline: Hitler vs. Trump

Step Hitler / Germany (1933–34) Trump / USA (2025)
1 month in Jan 30, 1933 – Appointed Chancellor in coalition; Nazis still lacked majority. Jan 20, 2025 – Inaugurated for second term. Day 1: rescinds Biden’s executive orders; signs EO 14149 (“Free Speech”).
Comment: Starts with sweeping executive power moves from Day 1.
1 month in Feb 27, 1933 – Reichstag Fire, used to justify emergency suspension of rights. Feb 2025 – EO ending birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens (blocked). Framed as urgent “national security” crisis.
Comment: Bold constitutional challenge within weeks, testing the courts.
2 months in Feb 28, 1933 – Reichstag Fire Decree suspends free press, assembly, privacy. Feb–Mar 2025 – EO “Protecting Against Invasion” portrays immigration as existential threat.
Comment: Escalates fear narrative, builds emergency logic.
2–3 months in Mar 5, 1933 – New elections; Nazis gain seats but not majority, suppress rivals. Mar 2025 – DOJ and DHS ordered to probe “election fraud networks”; ICE raids escalate.
Comment: Deploys justice system and security forces against political narrative of fraud.
3 months in Mar 23, 1933 – Enabling Act passed: Cabinet can legislate without Reichstag. Mar 31, 2025 – EO 14253 “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”
Comment: Cultural and educational institutions politicized by executive order.
3–4 months in Apr 1, 1933 – Boycott of Jewish businesses begins. Spring 2025 – Trump calls for boycotts of “woke companies,” threatens federal contracts.
Comment: Direct state pressure against private firms for ideological reasons.
6 months in July 1933 – Other parties banned; unions dissolved, Nazi “Labor Front” created. Summer 2025 – Declares “Crime Emergency” in Washington D.C., seizing police authority.
Comment: Expands presidential reach into local policing.
6–12 months in 1933–34 – Gleichschaltung: state gov’ts, schools, media “coordinated” under Nazi control. Mid–Late 2025 – Loyalists installed in DOJ, FCC, NEA, Smithsonian. DOJ prosecutes opponents. Late-night hosts Kimmel and Colbert dismissed under Trump-aligned pressure.
Comment: Institutions and media re-aligned for political loyalty.
17 months in Jun 30–Jul 2, 1934 – “Night of the Long Knives”: violent purge of rivals. Late 2025 – No purge, but DOJ indicts political enemies. Reports of loyalty oaths demanded from civil servants.
Comment: Legalistic purge replaces violent one, but same aim — eliminate rivals.
18 months in Aug 2, 1934 – Hindenburg dies; Hitler merges offices, becomes Führer. Army swears personal loyalty. Late 2025 – Trump explores reorganizing National Guard/DHS to answer directly to presidency. Loyalty demands spread across agencies.
Comment: Pushes personalization of state authority in military/security sectors.

Risk Assessment and Conclusion

The lesson from 1933–34 is chilling: democracies do not necessarily die in a coup. They can be strangled slowly, step by step, in the name of “law and order” or “national restoration.” By the time citizens realize what has been lost, the legal framework for resistance has already been dismantled.

Trump’s second term has not yet reached that point — but the comparison shows just how quickly things can move. Hitler needed only a year and a half to consolidate absolute power. Trump, in nine months, has already set in motion enough changes to destabilize America’s institutions if they go unchallenged.

The risk is not that the United States is destined to repeat Germany’s fate. The risk is that we assume “it can’t happen here,” even as the guardrails creak and the executive moves faster than our institutions can respond.

The question before us is simple: will we recognize the speed of erosion, or will we wake up one morning to find that the foundations of democracy have already been swept away?

Trump tells Black female reporter she is “obnoxious”

Trump to Black reporter: “Quiet. You’re really obnoxious. You are really obnoxious. I’m not going to talk to you…”

“Mr. President, what are your plans for—” the reporter began. Her name wasn’t immediately known.

“Quiet. You’re really obnoxious,” said Trump.

“I’m not obnoxious, but I’m trying to ask you what about your plans for Memphis,” said the reporter, as Trump continued to talk over her. “Many people want to know what the numbers are going to be like. What are your plans for Memphis, Mr. President?”

“You are really obnoxious,” said Trump. “I’m not going to talk to you until I call on you.” He then proceeded to direct his attention to other reporters.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-memphis-2674011687/

Trump’s policies are killing American farmers.

Farmers across the country are issuing increasingly urgent warnings that they’ll face grim consequences if they don’t get help selling this year’s bumper crop that many have begun harvesting. Trade deals many had hoped would quickly emerge after President Donald Trump slapped tariffs on some of the United States’ biggest agricultural customers haven’t come. A farm bailout is no sure thing on Capitol Hill. And farmers — many of whom voted for Trump — say time is running out.

“It just seems like things have stalled all summer long,” said Brian Warpup, who grows corn and soybeans on his 3,900-acre farm in northeastern Indiana. “We’re always hopeful that those negotiations are moving forward, but yet with harvest here, patience may be running thin.” Across the US, farmers describe increasingly dire circumstances stemming from a confluence of factors — trade wars, Trump’s immigration crackdown, inflation and high interest rates.

Though the challenges vary in different parts of the country, farmers in some cases, particularly on the West Coast, are struggling to find labor to pick their harvest. Others, especially in the Midwest, said they can’t sell what they’ve produced. And many are scrambling to find storage.

It’s led to pressures reminiscent of the trade wars from Trump’s first administration, when the federal government spent billions on bailouts to farmers. The world’s biggest soybean buyer, China, is so far this year refusing to purchase American soybeans — a critical export that the US Department of Agriculture said was worth nearly $25 billion last year — turning instead to Brazil as part of Beijing’s response to the tariffs Trump imposed on Chinese goods in February.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/20/politics/us-farmers-trump-tariffs-dire-consequences

Fox host Brian Kilmeade apologizes. NOT accepted. He intended to say it, he knew what he was doing.

“Fox & Friends” co-anchor Brian Kilmeade apologized on-air Sunday, days after saying that mentally ill unhoused people should be given “involuntary lethal injection.”

He made that comment during a discussion with fellow anchors Lawrence Jones and Ainsley Earhardt on Wednesday as they were talking about the slaying of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a light-rail train in Charlotte.

Kilmeade said what he said to score points with the brain-dead, drooling knuckle draggers who watch Fox.  He made his point, his audience just loved it.  His apology is bullshit.

Killing Charlie Kirk was an evil act; killing his ideas is a good thing

First, the obvious: Violence of any kind – political or otherwise – should never be accepted. The murder of right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk is a heinous crime. It’s a tragedy. It should be neither cheered nor used as a political talking point.

That’s how a civilized society is supposed to think and act. That’s what Christian teachings should tell us. Of course, that’s not what’s happening.

Many people are doing the right thing in condemning the killing and calling for an end to such violence. But some see this as a good thing, and some are blaming the left and calling for retribution, including the president and some members of Congress.

My God, when will we ever grow up? Will we ever be a nation of adults again?

The point here is to tell the truth, and the fact is two things can be true.

      1. The first is violence of any kind – political or otherwise – should never be accepted. The murder of right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk is a heinous crime. It’s a tragedy. It should be neither cheered nor used as a political talking point. 
      2. The second is this:  Charlie Kirk was a piece of shit.

Let’s explore that theory.

Kirk was a racist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, hateful, liar. Was he smart? Very much so? Was he successful? Absolutely. Was he charismatic? You could make an argument for that.

But he also spewed disgusting bile and ginned up hatred for various groups of people in this country in service to the corrupt, right-wing, MAGA agenda of four-time indicted, twice impeached, sexual assaulter, tax fraudster, insurrection inspirer, wannabe fascist dictator, convicted felon, Russian puppet, President Donald Trump.

Kirk was a cancer on society. He rallied his followers around his hate — the worst part being that many were young, impressionable people. He was helping to commit them to what for many will be a lifetime of misguided, unchristian, derangement. That’s not cheering his death. That’s just telling what the man was. That’s just telling the truth.

As an article on the Guardian website said: Kirk “did not shy away in his rhetoric from bigotry, intolerance, exclusion, and stereotyping.” Here are some examples of Kirk’s statements from the Guardian report:

*“If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.”

*“If you’re a WNBA (Women’s National Basketball Association) pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?”

*“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.”

*“If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence or is she there because of affirmative action?”

*“If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.”

*“Reject feminism. Submit to your husband Taylor (Swift). You’re not in charge.”

*“The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered.” – Responding to a question about whether he would support his 10-year-old daughter aborting a pregnancy conceived because of rape.

*“We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately.”

*“I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.”

*“America was at its peak when we halted immigration for 40 years and we dropped our foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever. We should be unafraid to do that.”

*“The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. The love it when America becomes less white.”

*“The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different.”

*“America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.”

*“We’ve been warning about the rise of Islam on the show, to great amount of backlash. We don’t care, that’s what we do here. And we said that Islam is not compatible with western civilization.”

*“Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.”

*“There is no separation of church and state. It’s a fabrication, it’s a fiction, it’s not in the constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists.”

I rest my case.

***

Trump plans to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Kirk. He’s called for flying flags at half-mast in his honor. Stunningly, my governor – Democrat Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania – has done likewise. Some want a statue of him erected at the U.S. Capitol.

The Green Bay Packers called for a moment of silence before their game with Washington Thursday night. What did the Black players on either team think about an outspoken racist being so honored?

MSNBC fired commentator Matthew Doud for saying this about Kirk: “He’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive young figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we are in.”

Doud got fired for telling the truth. He got fired even after apologizing. Even after saying “I in no way intended for my comments to blame Kirk for his horrendous attack.” Another cave by the mainstream media.

The New York Times published opinion columns putting Kirk in a good light while glossing over the destructive hate he embraced. Why the rush to promote a false idol? Is it fear of being called bias when all you’d be doing is telling the truth?

The Guardian article included this quote from Kirk: “We record all of it so that we put [it] on the internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence. That’s when civil war happens, because you start to think the other side is evil, and so they lose their humanity.”

It seems some in the media who are trying to put Kirk in the best possible light are grabbing onto this, that he pushed for debate on the issues. That’s fine, except that doesn’t erase what came out of his mouth, the demonizing, the dehumanizing, the damage it caused, and the willingness he had to see others suffer at the hands of positions and policies he supported. Don’t let the window dressing fool you.

I didn’t wish for Charlie Kirk’s death, but I’m not going to pretend he was something he wasn’t. I’m not going to lie and ignore the evil he carried with him, his willingness to call others to join him, and the damage it has and will do to my country.

Yes, Charlie Kirk was garbage. That said, he didn’t deserve to die.  But what he stood for does.

Trump’s insider team wake up to reality: Voters are not buying his bullshit

There is growing alarm within Donald Trump’s inner circle that his message on a booming economy is falling flat with voters who still see prices rising when they were promised the opposite would occur after he was re-elected.

According to a report from Politico’s Megan Messerly, one of the president’s longtime economic advisers conceded that growing angst that the president’s agenda could be waylaid by growing voter discontent because they feel things are not getting better as promised.

Noting that behind the scenes “White House officials acknowledge people just aren’t feeling it,” when Trump boasts he is behind the “best economy we’ve ever had,” Messerly pointed out, “But polls show Americans remain anxious about high prices, and there are signs the economy’s resilience is starting to fray, making it harder for the administration to close the delta between how the economy looks on paper and how people feel.”

That led Stephen Moore, who has often been at Trump’s side when it comes to explaining economic matters, to concede, “This is a thing that I know the White House political team is nervous about because there’s a reality and there’s a perception. And the reality is the economy is doing fine and the perception is people are still worried about things like grocery prices, which are still high, and still growing,” Former Trump campaign adviser Steve Cortes agreed and said fixing the perception problem is easier said than done.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-nervous/


 

” . . . fixing the perception problem is easier said than done.”

Because anyone with 2 brain cells (which Trump’s crew lacks) know it’s all bullshit and nothing more than a massive giveaway to the very wealthy.